"Each time a person stands up for an ideal, or acts to improve the lot of others. . .they send forth a ripple of hope, and crossing each other from a million different centers of energy and daring, those ripples build a current that can sweep down the mightiest walls of oppression and resistance."Robert F. Kennedy
Using grade school physics of both Newtonian and Nuclear models, does anyone foresee counter currents of sufficient size to minimize/change direction of the huge 'Tsunami' roaring down on us, taking away not only our Freedom, but our Lives? Regardless if our salaries are dependant on us not knowing the inconvenient truths of reality (global warming, corporate rule, stagnant energy science) portrayed by the rare articles in the news media? I know only one - a free science, our window to Reality - that easily resolves the Foundational Problem of Quantum Physics and takes E=MC2 out of Kindergarten

Full Text Individual Post Reading

Monday, August 6, 2007

Stop exporting death

Opinion not good from world majority (population numbers)
Meanwhile, Priority ONE ..................
Priority One A: energy evolution - stagnant and dead with a 100 year old equation, E=MC2, unexpanded, unevolved, petrified as in stone
Priority One B: Survival Criteria for increasingly complex, energy intensive 'holistic' global systems - nonexistent. (these criteria are derived directly from evolving energy stages beyond the caveman approach to nuclear energies - but then, that's The Trouble With Physics and pending trouble with civilization's future survival)

16:52, August 06, 2007 China News
Stop exporting death
The U.S. government's recent announcement of its providing a large batch of advanced weapons to Arabian allies and Israel has caused wide concern. What will be the impact of this U.S. act on the Middle East, a region already in disorder? For a long time, as many countries believe, Washington has been creating terror and split in this region so as to gain opportunities to sell weapons there, and the U.S. arms sale plan would intensify Middle East disturbance.In the world pattern of weaponry trade, the U.S. annual exports have been averaging 40 percent of world total since 1991. The sales stood between 10 to 13 billion U.S. dollars since 2001, and even hit a record of 15 billion dollars in 2006. The U.S. leads the world in sales of munitions as a whole, ground-to-air missiles and warships. As a matter of fact, on the proliferation of both conventional weapons and those of mass destruction including missiles as well as nuclear, biological and chemical weapons, the U.S. has always been the evil creator lurking behind.The U.S. means of armament promotion can also be lauded world top, which feature the "creation of need" where there is no need. Americans have continuously fanned up comparison among nations so each of them are eager to buy more advanced weapons than those the U.S. sold to its neighbors, so that one's own security is guaranteed. Such a vicious circle resulted in nations' dependence on U.S. arms, and consequently billions of dollars flew their way to the wallets of U.S. arms dealers each year.Asia has become in recently years the world largest arms import market, almost taking half of global imports from 2001 to 2004, and a large part of them were sold to the Middle East. The national defense expenditure of Middle East countries stood at 52 billion dollars in 2003, up 20 percent from 2002, and rose to 55 billion dollars in 2007, of which most were spent on arms purchase and the U.S. is the major supplier. However, the ample-equipped Middle East countries failed to enjoy the sense of security brought by new weapons, as the U.S. claimed, and people there still live in the shadow of war, with lives engulfed by flames every day. According to the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute, among every five ethnic conflicts ever happened worldwide four have related sides equipped with U.S. arms. The weapon export of the U.S., it seems, has brought more war and death rather than peace and security. Isn't it that the U.S. should reflect on itself earnestly?


By People's Daily Online

No comments: